Anomalous Inheritance in Rosa rugosa

In June, 1893, Burbank advertised his hybrid of Rugosa x Sinica [Laevigata]. I have found no description. However, there is a found rose in San Jose that has been labeled as 'Reblooming Anemone'. It looks like a Laevigata hybrid, usually, but on one occasion I found an odd appearance of numerous small, mostly straight prickles/bristles on a cane that did not have the typical smooth and waxy bark of R. laevigata or 'Anemone'. I have no evidence that this is Burbank's hybrid, but if someone wants to do a DNA study of an oddity, this is one I recommend.

Typical form of "Reblooming Anemone" Weird sport that seems to be expressing Rugosa-like traits.

Nyveldt's White. Nyveldt 1955. ((Rosa rugosa rubra x Rosa majalis) x Rosa nitida) Height: 6 ft. Repeats. Fragrant.

The New Plantsman 1(1): 10-13 (March 1994)
Rosa roxburghii: the species, its forms and hybrids
Graham Stuart Thomas

At some time before 1905, R. roxburghii was crossed with R. rugosa Thunb., ever a fertile parent, and the result partakes equally of both, being a good dense bush of some 2 m, well clad in its crisp foliage, amongst which the wide pale flowers tend to hide themselves. The stems are prickly like those of R. rugosa and the bark does not peel. It is interesting that the rounded, large heps are bristly and have some orange colouring. It was named R. x micrugosa Henkel.

During his experimental work with the parentage of roses at Cambridge in the second quarter of this century, Dr C.C. Hurst raised seedlings of this cross, one of which was named R. x micrugosa 'Alba'. Apart from being of rather more upright habit, it is in other respects a replica of the original but of important garden value because the white flowers are produced not only at midsummer, but onwards throughout the growing season. They are, moreover, very fragrant. This might prove to to be a fertile parent and thus bring both species into today's hybrids. They would be very hardy.

David Austin's English Roses (1993) p. 28

The third line we pursued was by way of the Rugosa hybrid 'Conrad Ferdinand Meyer.' At first we harbored no great hopes of success, for we feared that the resulting seedlings from a cross with this excessively vigorous hybrid would be altogether too gross in character. 'Conrad Ferdinand Meyer' was itself a cross between the very popular and beautiful Climbing Noisette Rose 'Gloire de Dijon,' and an unknown Rugosa hybrid. It also had one of the most powerful and delicious fragrances. As before, we crossed with some of our better English Rose in particular 'Chaucer,' and had one of those pieces of luck that sometimes turn up in rose breeding. Some of the seedlings from this cross were of typical rugosa appearance, while others bore absolutely no resemblance to a Rugosa Rose. It seemed that some of our hybrids had taken the genes only from the 'Gloire de Dijon' half of 'Conrad Ferdinand Meyer,' while others had inherited those from the Rugosa side. What we had in many instances were in effect hybrids of 'Gloire de Dijon.'

Hereditas 28:237 (1942)
Cross experiments in the genus Rosa
Åke Gustafsson

Svalöf, Sweden, November 1941

A further rugosa-cross remains (1934:4). Here the situation is more complex, since one specimen shows no signs of the father, but yet without being maternal, and since the other specimen is probably a true hybrid with a great prevalence of the mother's characters. The former is entirely sterile in 1941, no hips being formed, although it flowered abundantly. The latter plant agrees in respect to sterility, hip-properties and content of ascorbic acid with the canina-rugosa hybrids mentioned previously. Cytological studies as well as progeny controls will at once elucidate the state of things.

Hereditas 30:411-412 (1944)
The Constitution of the Rosa canina Complex
Åke Gustafsson

Institute of Genetics, Svalöf, Sweden

R. canina II x rugosa: 1934-4 — This series consists of two individuals. One is a monosomic plant showing almost no trace of the father but also being very unlike the mother. It is smaller and less vigorous than its sister-plant, having few and rather weak prickles, small purely white petals, a light-green colour on stem and leaves, and lacks anthocyanin. It is less winter-hardy than its sister-plant; during the cold winters 1941 and 1942 the superterrestrial parts were entirely killed. It cannot be a monosomic of the mother-plant since the meiotic behaviour is that typical of canina-rugosa hybrids. Therefore in this case the loss of one chromosome obliterates the characters brought in by the rugosa genome.

CybeRose note: this specimen is particularly interesting in regards to Hurst's "Septet Theory". Apparently the sectional characters are linked to a single chromosome—and presumably only a portion of one—rather than distributed among the set of seven chromosomes. A "Supergene Theory" could replace Hurst's early effort, and duplicate most of the behaviors and predictions.

Rowley also studied aneuploidy in roses (Journ of Genetics, 57. 1960-61), and mentioned Gustafsson's specimen. However, most of the aneuploids discussed differed little from expectation. Which is to say that the seven chromosomes of the basic set are not equal in their effects on the plant.

A Rose Odyssey (1937: p123-124)
J H Nicolas

In 1933 I had found a curious sport on Margaret McGredy. The foliage strongly resembled Rugosa but the plant characteristics also leaned toward R. cinnamomea. I mentioned this fact to Sam III [McGredy] when I visited him in 1934. Sam could not account for the sport. He had never used species in his breeding. His brother-in-law, Walter I. Johnston, spoke up, "Your father did much more work with species." We adjourned to the office, where complete hybridizing records from the early days of the firm are kept, one volume for each year, a valuable library. After several hours of research we traced the origin of Margaret McGredy to crosses of Rugosa and Cinnamomea. They were, of course, many generations back. But as these two species are in the blood stream of Margaret McGredy and all modern McGredy roses, the possibility of the sport was explained. It is an accepted fact that hybrids alone sport (pure species mutate, but rarely, if ever, sport) and can sport only within what is in them.*

Lately, the most unusual thing has happened to that sport. A sport is supposed to be a part of the hybrid compound which "took a walk". But this sport must have carried the whole pack as it has sported again a Hybrid Tea type with a magnificent bloom much more intensely colored than the original Margaret McGredy and is distinctly a different rose. I am planning to name it "Margaret Second".

*A mutation is a significant change in form or character occurring suddenly in a single generation. H. de Vries defines it: "A permanent transmissible variation in organisms, as distinguished from a sport." A sport is a change in some part of a plant due to disturbance or dissociation of the compound of a hybrid. A sport character is seldom transmissible.

American Rose Annual 41: 123-125 (1956)
New Approach To The Breeding Of Hardy Roses
Dr. F. L. Skinner

Under label Iowa #9 I received from Professor Buck a semi-double white rose resembling a Rugosa but which I am told has no Rugosa in its pedigree;

CybeRose note: These surprizing results in Rosa rugosa hybrids inform us that there is more to heredity than Mendel conceived. Where Gustafsson found the influence of Rugosa to be dominant, and associated with a single chromosome, Nicolas's account reveals that the distinctive character of Rugosa's leaves can lie dormant for several generations, awaken briefly in a sport, then again disappear in a subsequent sport.

Rose breeding Heredity